Here's a draft - comments welcome Geoff Internet Domain Names With the increasing levels of awareness of the commercial possibilities inherent in a public data network, heralded by the recent heightened awareness of the Internet, the issue of the governance of the name infrastructure of the Internet within Australia is exhibiting signs of growth-related stress. The Internet itself uses unique 32 bit numeric address values within the underlying IP data protocol to identify connected Internet host systems. The allocation of these numeric values is undertaken under the authority of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) which undertakes this function using a regional delegation model, which in turn assigns address blocks to Internet Service Providers for ultimate assignation to end subscribers. These addresses are commonly denoted using a 'dotted quad' syntax, such as 203.50.0.1, to denote the 32 bit value. However these numeric addresses are not commonly used by end user applications. These applications use a domain name syntax to provide alphanumeric aliases for the underlying numeric addresses. This name space is referred to as the "Internet Domain Name System" (DNS). This name space is a hierarchically defined space, where at each level further sub-hierarchies can be defined using a right-to-left hierarchy designation with the "." character used as the hierarchy delimiter. Thus the domain name "host.acme.com" indicates a top level hierarchy of "com", a second level delegation of "acme" and a third level delegation of "host". The initial top level delegations are managed by the IANA, and subsequent name hierarchy levels are managed through a delegation process, where a Designated Administrator manages all entries in the designated level of the hierarchy and undertakes further sub-delegations as necessary. This delegation also includes the delegation of determination of appropriate policies which allow entries to be added into the name space at the delegated level of the hierarchy. The top level name delegations in use today break down to two major categories: the so-called International Top Level Domains (iTLDs) and the national Top Level Domains (nTLDs). The major active iTLDs in use today are ".net" and ".com", both operated by Network Solutions Inc, under the terms of a cooperative agreement with the US National Science Foundation. National top level domains are assigned to national entities in line with the ISO standard ISO 3166, using the international two letter country designators. These nTLDs are delegated to appropriate bodies who can undertake domain name delegation within each country. In 1988 the ISO 3166 two letter code for Australia, ".au" was delegated by IANA to Robert Elz, of the Computer Science Department, University of Melbourne. At the time Robert managed the Internet electronic mail gateway between the Australian Internet email community and the larger international Internet email systems then in use. This delegation has remained with Robert Elz to the present. Major second level delegations were undertaken to define distinct name spaces educational bodies (".edu.au"), government bodies ("gov.au"), commercial bodies (".com.au") and network service providers (".net.au"). This delegation structure is broadly similar to that undertaken within many other nTLDs, and name delegation was undertaken by voluntary Domain Name Administrators on a free of charge basis. With the increasing level of awareness of the Internet within Australia the level of activity within the domain ".com.au" has increased dramatically, and currently some 10,000 name delegations have been undertaken within this domain. This growth in the demand level of ".com.au" domain names has highlighted two major shortcomings of this volunteer structure: 1. the level of activity to undertake name registration has overwhelmed the capacity of voluntary effort, and 2. the use of a single name space for commercial entities within Australia has lead to a number of disputes of the use of a domain name, and the position of the Domain Name Administrator with respect to potential liabilities in undertaking this function is very unclear. In response to these shortcomings on 1 November 996 Robert Elz re-delegated the ".com.au" domain name to Melbourne IT, who have undertaken this function on a fee for service basis. This was undertaken after a 4 month long process of industry consultation, under the auspices of a DNS Summit, hosted by the Internet Service Providers' Industry Association, INTIAA. However this is not a stable longer term solution to the current shortcomings of the DNS Domain Administration function. While the fee for service structure allows the use of full time staff to process the requests in a timely fashion, the issue of legal liability of the Domain Name Administrator in undertaking the function remains unclear. The fundamental cause of this shortcoming is the implicit assumption that the Internet Domain Name environment is not considered to be an authoritative name source, and litigants can cite the actions of other public name allocation authorities as some form of overriding legitimacy of exclusive right to a name and claim damages against the operators of the domain name system. This is a flawed environment, and can only be addressed by a fundamental shift within the public regulatory environment to allow a managed framework of registration of Internet Domain Names, where due adherence to the defined framework will ensure that the process creates a name authority for the a name which is functionally independent of any other means of citation of authority to use a name. Thus the process of assigning an Internet Domain Name to an entity (on the basis that the name has not been already assigned to any other party, that the bona fides of the applicant had been established, the appropriate fees (if stipulated) had been paid and the relevant administrative policy and process for the .com.au domain space had been strictly followed should be an act which does not incur a subsequent liability on the part of the .com.au Domain Name Administrator or the operators of an electronic Domain Name Registry. This does require some form of public instrument to effect this critical change in recognising the authenticity of the Internet Domain Name environment as a public name authority in its own right. It is noted that such public recognition of the activity may be accompanied by operation of the process by a duly created operating entity as a component of government administration, or it may be accompanied by a process of more formal delegation the responsibility for the operation to duly authorised bodies. Either approach would be a significant step forward in preserving the value and utility of the ".au" name domain over the current situation, as it would add a visible line of derivation of authority within a process where the ultimate functionality of the Internet domain name system is the foremost concern and the integrity of that functionality would be best safeguarded through such measures. -- Geoff.Huston§telstra.net Network Technical Manager Locked Bag 5744, Telstra Internet Canberra ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA ph +61 6 208 1908 fax +61 6 248 6165 ----------------------- And as a quick postscript to those cut and paste reporters lurking out there... Copyright of this message is asserted by Geoff Huston Permission to reproduce this message in whole or in part in any medium other than the Internet is expressly NOT provided by the copyright owner. -----------------------Received on Mon Dec 09 1996 - 15:34:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC