Re: DNS: DNA Selection Criteria V3.1

Re: DNS: DNA Selection Criteria V3.1

From: Kevin Dinn <kevin§zip.com.au>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 1997 15:57:27 +0000
At 00:39 1/08/97 EDT, you wrote:
>>7. DNA licences should be reviewed and renewed annually or more
>>frequently at the discretion of the ADNA board.
>
>My suggestion is that ADNA issue DNA licences that are:
>*Valid for a period of one year
>*Automatically renewed, only subject to the DNA continuing to meet
>set criteria (as amended by ADNA from time to time), and subject to
>the DNA having paid any charges due to ADNA.

I'm not sure how this is different to what has been said.

>Perhaps a new rule 7:
>DNAs must impartially apply the rules for domain names as approved
>by ADNA for the 2LD.

This is a code of conduct thing.

>>8. DNA must be prepared to commit to abide by the DNA Code of
>>Conduct.
>
>Suggest we delete 'be prepared to commit to' from clause 8.

OK - Done that.
Regards

--
Kevin Dinn ____________________    o    _          _--_|\    ZIP P/L 
Business Manager              /____|___|_)________/______\_____________
www.zip.com.au                         | .        \_.--._/  Virtually
Phone: (Australia) 02 92 704 777  Fax: 92 475 276       v  the best :-)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
(soon to be ex) President - Australian Internet Alliance (www.aia.asn.au)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Received on Fri Aug 01 1997 - 17:13:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC