> So the questions are: > 1. Should .pr.au be first come first served? Yes, they all should as long as it's a current PRODUCT of the company, how are you going to decide this ? Will room be made for a company to get a domain for a product about to be launched ? > 2. If yes - then why not make .com.au the same? Why not indeed? A) Is this the same question as a Free-for-all 2ld ? > 3. Should we create a new 2ld for first come first served instead? Not necessarily. I think they should all be first come first served, but I think there should be some domain space for the Internet community members that want their own without having a company. Free-for-all space would be much more applicable. > 4. Should we allow new 2lds to be launched before competing > registrars exist? no - obviously not. Has anyone taken the time before this to ask this question ?? This is not become a government de-regulated market merely to pass the responsibility and money that obviously goes with it to either IIA or ISOC/ISOC-AU. Competition is at the heart of this.... Who will choose and what is the criteria for Registrar determination in this ? Is the question now asked for a reason on IIA's part ? I think some more fundamental questions really need to be asked here given the obvious debacle that a single registrar has given us so far. Regards, Peter Clark -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Peter Clark Pre-Sales Engineer OzEmail/Access One Phone: +612 9433 2486 Fax: +612 9437 5888 Email: pjcoz§ozemail.com.au -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Received on Tue May 05 1998 - 15:25:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC