Quoting Jeff Williams:
| 
|   It also is very evident from the archives that anyone that does not agree
| with the direction of the EC on this list, is very likely to be banned.  This
| type of action is reprehensible as shows poor leadership.  I have already had
| a series of exchanged with David COnrad on this issue, and have found
| that there seems to be some entrenchment on the part of the APNIC
| leadership, without a clear consensus of it's members or a open discussion
| of issues raised as result ot these discussions, prior to my subscribing to
| this list.  I have also found that members of some other lists on APNIC,
| are restricted and some of the statements made by the EC about archives
| being readily available on the PNIC site to be less than factual, see
| (www.apnic.net).  I had to ask Dave Conrad where to rind them, and they
| are not pointed to from any link that is can find from the APNIC home page as
| some of the leadership of APNIC have claimed.  This sort of thing leads to
| mistrust and does not serve APNIC in a good light.

What does this list have to do with APNIC? It's convened by the Internet
Industry Association of Australia to discuss policy matters of .au.

If you want to go on and on about wrongs that have been done to you by APNIC,
or disinformation regarding the MOU, or whatever - this ISN'T the place to
discuss it.

Unless you have a particular interest in being involved in discussion involving
.au policy, why are you on this list?

kim
--
Kim Davies, http://www.cynosure.com.au/kim/