>> Now, Jeff, perhaps you can explain in BRIEF terms what the MOUvement was >> about, and why ADNA in itself is so much like it. And why it in the end >> failed and fell so flat on it's face costing innocent people tens of >> thousands of dollars. > > Well it is all in the E-mail archives on the IAHC site, those archives that >still remain that is. Recently some gaps have showen up. Hummmmm? Sounds a bit like ADNA. "We are speaking to ISOC-AU" then it's "Ok the minutes have been edit to reflect the truth." Talk about X-Files :) >> Jeff, you'll notice from the Draft documents on the ADNA web site that the >> fees and process to become a Registrar under ADNA (which has as much >> authority over any portion of the DNS as does the IAHC) is very similar to >> the IAHC documents, plus or minus a few changes. > > I havn't compleated my review as of yet. But thus far the similarity is >indeed amazing thus far. I thought you'd find it interesting. I miht prompt Karl to enter as well. >> You will also notice after reading the archives that the ADNA process was >> "closed" meetings and of course no public non membership input. > > Yes I have. Not a good policy. Won't stand up in the marketplace long. It hasn't anyway.Received on Sat May 23 1998 - 14:21:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC