>As long as all ISPs recognise that domains granted through a hierarchy >leading back to the IANA at the top are valid, then DNS customers can >expect other people on the Internet to be able to resolve their domain >as long as it was approved through this chain of authority back to IANA. >Of course some ISPs may choose to recognise other hierarchies as well. >__________________________________________________________________________ > David Keegel <djk§cyber.com.au> URL: http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/ >Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network management > David Keegel's point above is spot on. It includes the 'legacy' domains and excludes .aus, and currently the so called 'gTLDs' etc. The delegated authority flows down from IANA through both .com.au but as importantly, via the INTERNIC licence contract to every owner of every subdomain of .com, .net, .org etc. So Ozemails authority to sell .aust.com subdomains is identical to MelbIT's. Both of these are "granted through a hierarchy leading back to IANA". As far as 'official' recognition is concerned, the concept is reflexive and requires a recognised authority. So far, that is not ADNA, although they aspire to and may obtain this consensus. The only such Australian 'official' obtains his authority from IANA and Jon Postel, and has no juristiction over anything other than .AU Perhaps Robert would like to comment? _____________________________________________ Larry Bloch Chief Executive Officer NetRegistry Pty Limited email: larry§netregistry.au.com Office: +61-(0)2-9555 6299 Fax: +61-(0)2-9555 5808 http://www.netregistry.au.com Domain House, PO Box 2088, Sydney, NSW 1043 _____________________________________________Received on Mon May 25 1998 - 00:28:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC