At 09:36 26/06/98 +1000, you wrote: > and I'd like to prove journalists aren't all negative story-hungry >bastards ;-) Now _THAT_ may take a bit of doing <G> The FAQ sounds like a good idea, would give some structure and history. What do others think? I would also like to suggest that seeing some of the "on the ball" blokes/blokettes around here have come up with some very good lists of discussion points and action items that these require further expansion and discussion. The discussion of multiple issues on a "flat" format such as listservers is difficult. Perhaps a threaded discussion board could be used to follow these through as well. That would also give us a history/archive. I will have a go at getting one up by the end of the day, post the url, and see what the majority thinks. BTW. not everyone has the luxury of "reply to all/reply to sender" on their mailers. I _personally_ find it a nuisance when a list reply goes auto only to the individual poster. I have to cut and paste the list address into the header, or make another nickname and do a "reply to <scroll down list>" i kinda liked it the way it was. Maybe I'm just old fasioned about my netiquite standards, but thats how I set the defaults up on my lists also. Ron Ron Ipsen, Managing Director, Gippsland Internet Pty Ltd Ph: 61 3 51 276543 Fax: 61 3 51 262020 http://www.comu.net.au - Gippslands Community Network http://www.gips.com.au - bringing Gippsland business online. http://www.amputee.org - amputees working together.Received on Fri Jun 26 1998 - 14:15:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC