Dear Sandra While I can sympathise on many of the points you raised in your last email, I must say that from what I've seen of the process used at the last meeting, it was an utter shambles. As a (frustrated) person who has watched and participated in the DNS debate over the last 2-3 years, I cannot support what happened at the Friday meeting and I believe it completely unfair to the public to send the now radically different document to the government. Public comment was on a one or two class based system. The WG suddenly jumped up with three. Much as I hate the amount of time that has been wasted on this topic of debate already, I do not believe this document can go forth without public discussion on the three class system. This to me is the only way to make sure there is consensus. To me, if the DNA of .asn.au and an ISOC-AU Director have severe problems with the way the Friday meeting was held, I am inclined to want to see a better process used. Regards, Antony. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antony Healey ISOC-AU Founding Member Ph: +61 2 9834 6055 General Manager & Director Fax: +61 2 9834 6249 Healey Communications Australia -- Giving you the world... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Mar 15 1999 - 11:37:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC