> Out of curiosity what do the .auDA boad members think about > such reforms (I do hope they are on this list). Hey, I'm a member of the auDA interim board - I'll bite :) Firstly, let me start by saying that what the auDA board members think about .edu.au policy is pretty irrelevant, since auDA proposes that members will set policy via a public process - see www.auda.org.au/panel.html for details. But I'm happy to express my individual opinion. My own belief is that .edu.au should be reserved for entities that are accredited by Australian Federal, State or Territory governments as either: * Primary Schools * Secondary Schools * Tertiary educational institutions (Universities, TAFEs, etc) Yes, I reckon the criteria should be objective, and it should be based on existing criteria - governments already accredit these types of institutions for various purposes. And yes, this rule would exclude all sorts of educational related entities - some for-profit, some not-for-profit. The reason for excluding all these other 'educational' entities, is that without some sort of objective criteria, I can't make sense of which entities to allow into .edu.au, and which ones to exclude. As has already been said in previous postings, there are all sorts of educational entities, from those offering MicroSoft Certification courses, to those offering Driving Courses. Do they all get into .edu.au? If not, what is the criteria? Actually, I reckon there are bugger-all entities that don't do at least _some_ education; my own business does a fair bit. So then is every entity allowed into .edu.au? If yes, then why have .edu.au - its then indistinguishable from .com.au or .net.au. If no, then where do we draw the line? I can see no value in having a separate .edu.au unless there exist objective criteria that ensure that .edu.au only includes a subset of entities for which there is a high community level of agreement that they are educational institutions. If entities that a significant number of people do not believe are appropriate are included in any 2LD, then the justification for having that separate 2LD disappears. Regards, Mark Mark Hughes auDA Treasurer & Membership Officer www.auda.org.au auda.treasurer§pplications.com.au 04 1374 3959Received on Wed Aug 25 1999 - 22:08:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC