Michael

I'm happy to listen, respond to and acknowledge my peers opinions, but its
not really fair to make unsubstantiated, defamatory remarks in a public
forum.

And actually, the term "soap boxing" was deliberately used little tongue in
cheek because its should be abundantly clear that  that's exactly what I was
doing.

Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:michael§mediakinetix.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 13:34
To: dns§auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] Public soap boxing, Australia Post, NetRegistry and
AUNIC


Public Soap Boxing Larry ?

Is that how you see the opinion of your peers ?

very interesting

Michael Verga

-----Original Message-----
From: larry§netregistry.au.com [mailto:larry§netregistry.au.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:06 PM
To: Dns§Auda. Org. Au
Subject: [DNS] Public soap boxing, Australia Post, NetRegistry and AUNIC


All,

Comments have been made on this list accusing NetRegistry of spamming the
AUNIC database. They are completely inaccurate and a mistake on the part of
Joshua Rowe.

I would hope that he would be brave enough to apologise for his damaging
remarks.

That notwithstanding, NetRegistry hosts the AUNIC database, and this has
become the subject of some suspicion. For the record:

1. NetRegistry takes its community responsibility in hosting this key
component of Australia's Internet infrastructure very seriously.
2. NetRegistry under no circumstances sends spam to AUNIC entrants. Our bulk
email direct marketing is restricted solely to our customers who have
provided their information to us voluntarily for the purposes of customer
relationship management.
3. NetRegistry advertises on the AUNIC website under a contract agreed to by
auDA and this is our sole commercial benefit for providing this service to
auDA for nothing (including bandwidth, equipment and support).
4. Like many companies, NetRegistry does undertake telemarketing, and
publicly available whois information is sometimes used for this purposes -
for example to get contact details for a website a telemarketer may be
viewing. This I consider acceptable use.
5. In future, all list members should understand that comments made on this
list that fall under defamation or libel legislation are actionable. This
(although I am not a lawyer) would seem to include replying to a message
with a defamatory subject line.

Lastly, I have never understood why people on email lists seem so keen to
sling mud around. The notion of common courtesy seems to take a leave of
absence when the Internet is involved. Perhaps that's part of the reason the
bubble came and went. Contentious issues are best dealt with directly
between protagonists without resort to public soap boxing.


Regards

Larry Bloch
Chief Executive Officer
____________________________________________
NetRegistry     http://www.netregistry.au.com
Tel: +61 2 9699 6099 | Fax: +61 2 9699 6088
PO Box 270 Broadway NSW   2007 Australia


--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 350 subscribers.
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.



--
This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author. 350 subscribers.
Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request§auda.org.au to be removed.