>However - If you hide behind anonymity - and worse..
>pretend to be a 
>Melbourne IT spokesperson - as your last two posts
>suggest - then I 
>suggest 
>the other members of this forum treat you with the
>ridicule you deserve

Peter Dean, i am not from melbourne IT. I am simply
someone that has the experience of a world class
company.Obviosuly something you lack.

John 5




--- Peter <peter&#167;instra.com.au> wrote:
> John 5
> 
> If you identify yourself and your interests - I will
> be delighted to answer 
> your questions
> 
> However - If you hide behind anonymity - and worse..
> pretend to be a 
> Melbourne IT spokesperson - as your last two posts
> suggest - then I suggest 
> the other members of this forum treat you with the
> ridicule you deserve
> 
> Good bye - In 1 hour all your posts will hit my
> trash bin
> 
> Peter Dean
> 
> PS ... To Kim  - How soon can we remove these
> children from the list and 
> have only identifiable contributors?
> 
> 
> At 07:21 PM 3/22/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >Demanding respect and recognition ?  It's almost
> >laughable.
> >
> >Would it be fair to say that Peter Dean registered
> the
> >following domain
> >names and uploaded his commercial websites knowing
> >there was a possibility
> >he was about to confuse and possibly deceive
> >Australian consumers?  He was
> >instructed by auDA to place the following warning
> on
> >the sites,  "If you
> >arrived here expecting the Australian Network
> >Information Centre (aunic)
> >Click Here"  Perhaps he should have been advised by
> >auDA to give up the idea
> >totally and save credibility.
> >
> >www.aunic.com.au
> >www.aunic.net.au
> >
> >The websites remain. An auDA Director clearly sees
> no
> >harm in possibly
> >misleading Australian consumers, and THAT is not
> >laughable. Should we accept
> >such arrogance and perhaps irresponsible behaviour,
> >simply because Peter
> >Dean is an auDA Director? Not a chance. One may
> gain
> >respect leading by
> >example, there is no place for arrogance and/or
> shonky
> >practices.
> >
> >
> >
> >John 5
> >
> >--- Peter <peter&#167;instra.com.au> wrote:
> > > A direct question to Dassa
> > >
> > > If auDA ignore there legal advisors and accept
> > > yours... How would you view
> > > the actions of the auDA board if auDA is
> > > successfully sued - would you ask
> > > the board members to pay from their own pocket
> > > because of their
> > > irresponsible behavior?
> > >
> > > That's a straight question deserving a straight
> > > answer.
> > >
> > > Peter Dean
> > > Chairman - The Instra Group
> > > Director - auDA
> > > My views are my own and do not necessarily
> reflect
> > > those of the
> > > organisations mentioned above.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 10:56 AM 3/23/02 +1100, you wrote:
> > > >|> -----Original Message-----
> > > >|> From: Ron Stark
> > > [mailto:ronstark&#167;businesspark.com.au]
> > > >|> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:32 AM
> > > >|> To: 'dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au'
> > > >|> Subject: RE: [DNS] DNS List
> > > >|>
> > > >|>
> > > >|> My understanding ( and I am open to be
> corrected
> > > here) is
> > > >|> that a forum such
> > > >|> as this list falls under the Publications
> Act or
> > > similar, and as such
> > > >|> renders the publisher (auDA) liable for its
> > > content -
> > > >|> despite the fact that
> > > >|> they have no direct input.
> > > >|>
> > > >|> Look at Yahoo (I think) being sued for
> allowing
> > > Nazi
> > > >|> memorabilia to be sold
> > > >|> on its auction site.
> > > >
> > > >Websites are different to mailing lists.  The
> > > comparision can not be
> > > >made.  Also, the fact there are legal entities
> > > willing to take a case
> > > >does not mean the case is justified or the
> > > inferences correct.
> > > >
> > > >Logic tells me a mailing list is no different
> to
> > > the participants
> > > >posting directly.  The mailing list host only
> > > facilitates the subscriber
> > > >base.  They are not publishers but transport
> > > agents.  If mailing lists
> > > >are deemed to be legally publishers then Post
> > > Offices should also.  And
> > > >Phone Book distributers.  They all become
> liable
> > > for any content
> > > >distributed using their services.
> > > >
> > > >Don't mind me.  I'm getting fed up with the
> legal
> > > fraternity turning the
> > > >Internet into another litigation playground.
> > > >
> > > >Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> > > http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > > >Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> > > without permission of the
> > > >author, further information at the above URL. 
> (319
> > > subscribers.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> > > http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> > > without permission of the
> > > author, further information at the above URL. 
> (319
> > > subscribers.)
> > >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy
> Awards®
> >http://movies.yahoo.com/
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> >Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of the
> >author, further information at the above URL.  (319
> subscribers.)
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (316
> subscribers.)
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/