In the context of the conversation, the identity of
the writer of the
comments below is totally irrelevant. Peter Dean
should get off his high
horse and stop attempting to divert focus for he is
the one reacting in a
childish manner. My identity has no reflection on the
facts as presented.
For this is not personal at all Mr Dean. Facts are
facts and the facts are
as stated below. Now the manner in which you respond
simply indicates that
you are willing, if not eager, to damage your own
credibility more so.

John 5

--- Rod Keys <rod&#167;ddns.com.au> wrote:
> I know Peter..
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter" <peter&#167;instra.com.au>
> To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 2:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Channel partner and Bruce Tomkin
> 
> 
> > Am I mistaken - or is this thread NOT being
> answered by Melbourne IT.
> >
> > Beware the anonymous reply
> >
> > Will John 5 please identify him/her self and their
> interests?
> >
> > Peter Dean
> >
> >
> > At 07:13 PM 3/22/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> > >  Mr Keys
> > >Melboune IT is a great BIG company, and often it
> takes time to do all the
> > >necessary changes, for example the Resellers
> interface still says
> "Channel
> > >Partner", i think we should just be respectful
> about what MIT has
> achieved
> > >so far and not be too suscpicious about what they
> do, you see i am sure
> > >that in time Melbourne IT will do what is right
> for everybody, including
> > >"valuable" channel partners.
> > >I don't think it is really that big of a problem
> and i think that as
> > >respected and respectful resellers we should just
> see that it is all fair
> > >, especially for the protection of resellers that
> just do normal business
> > >as opposed to resellers that are driven by greed
> and suspicious marketing
> > >technique.... it should all be a fair ground ,
> all resellers should have
> > >the same tools and then the only thing that
> should make them perform
> > >better would be "originality" and "efficient"
> marketing within the code
> of
> > >practice and code of conduct.
> > >Instead of attacking it is very easy to politely
> ask "Bruce, would it be
> > >ok to have a notice to resellers sent about
> recent changes for those who
> > >did not get it ?"
> > >Best Regards
> > >John 5
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   Rod Keys <rod&#167;ddns.com.au> wrote: I was
> replying to Bruces comments
> > > that there is no such thing as channel
> > >partners anymore only resellers.. my point is
> melbourne IT operational
> staff
> > >are still calling themselves channel partner
> support instead of reseller
> > >support it's like changing which side of the road
> we drive on but not
> > >telling the police.
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Provisionaly Accredited"
> > >To:
> > >Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 1:58 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [DNS] Channel partner and Bruce
> Tomkin
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Rod Keys,
> > > >
> > > > No offense intended, but It would be very
> useful to prevent people
> like
> > >DDNS, ING and IRA to use that as leverage in
> unscollicited mail sent to
> > >other (what used to be named) channel partner's
> customers...but anyway,
> what
> > >do i know. Bruce will probably give you a good
> reply to that.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards
> > > >
> > > > John 5
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rod Keys wrote: Bruce ..
> > > > How on earth can you say that there is no such
> thing as channel
> partners
> > > > anymore when just today(Friday) I was talking
> with channel partner
> support
> > > > that's how they identified themselves and
> moreover I had to send email
> to
> > > > cp&#167;melbourneit.com.au to have a request
> escalated please send the
> email to
> > > > channel partners &#167; melbourne it thank you very
> much.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rod Keys
> > > > Director
> > > > DDNS
> > > > 8/118 Church St,
> > > > Hawthorn, Vic, 3122
> > > > Ph 03 9815 6868
> > > > Fax 03 9815 6800
> > > > rod&#167;ddns.biz
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >-
> > > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> > >http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of
> the
> > > > author, further information at the above URL.
> (319 subscribers.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy
> Awards®
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > >Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of the
> > >author, further information at the above URL.
> (319 subscribers.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---------------------------------
> > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy
> Awards®
> >
> >
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of the
> > author, further information at the above URL. 
> (319 subscribers.)
> >
> >
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list
> without permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.  (316
> subscribers.)
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/