Hi Mark & Ian
Whilst I appricate your comments picture this scene. I have purchased some
goods on line and several days later they have not arrived. I try to ring
them but alas no answer or worse still the phone is disconnected. Their web
site lists their mailing address is a PO Box. What fall back as a consumer
do I have? however if the address details are available where they cannot be
hidden I at least have some redress and this has happened to me. I was able
to go to the police and they followed it up and guesswhat I got my money
back.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Smith" <smithi&#167;nimnet.asn.au>
To: "Mark Hughes" <effectivebusiness&#167;pplications.com.au>
Cc: "Jo Lim" <jo.lim&#167;auda.org.au>; "Dns Discussion Listserver"
<dns&#167;auda.org.au>
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [DNS] Comments on draft whois policy


> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Mark Hughes wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>  > As there are clear benefits but no identifiable downside, I strongly
support
>  > removing "Registrant Street" from the publicly visible whois data.
>
> Well made arguments Mark; smells good to me (fwiw!)
>
> Cheers, Ian
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (307 subscribers.)
>
>