For more info, see: Schedule A, or the auDA registrars licence agreement. http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-registrar-agreement.pdf > -----Original Message----- > From: Marco Botros [mailto:mehanna§tpg.com.au] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:28 PM > To: dns§lists.auda.org.au > Subject: Re: [DNS] Reseller Fees > > > You can spend up to an half hour trying to understand this > MIT price clause: > > AuDa requires it's accredit Registrars to pay AuDa a fee of > $250 for each of it's > resellers which have not previously been registered with AuDa > through a different > registrar. Where the relevant reseller has previously been > registered with auDa by > a different Registrar, there is an additional fee payable to > auDa of $AU25 each time > the same reseller is registered with auDa through a > different registrar. MIT will > charge the authorized reseller the applicable auDa fee within > 14 days of being > invoiced for it by auDa > > >>>the most confusing clause in the whole agreement!!! > > regards, > > Marco Botros > Operations Manager > Spirit Servers > mehanna§spiritservers.com.au > http://spiritservers.com.au > > ******************************************************* > Spirit Servers, "A Solid, Reliable .dotHosting". > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Adam Todd <auda§todd.inoz.com> > To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:04 PM > Subject: RE: [DNS] Reseller Fees > > > At 11:43 9/07/02 +0100, you wrote: > >It is my understanding that auDA is charging this amount to > all registrars > >for all resellers they appoint. > > My goodness, I've NEVER heard of any such thing. > > This moves closer and closer to abuse of market power it's not funny. > > Imagine if Petrol Companies charges service stations a fee to > sell petrol! > > Or Telstra charged a fee to ... oh hang on, they already own > the market. > > I'll have to check various laws again, but I do recall > somewhere that a fee > can not be charged by an association or organisation to > become a user of > seller of the services. > > In fact I'm sure it's an ACCC ruling. I think we used it in > the TIO case. > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => > http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without > permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. (329 subscribers.) > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => > http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without > permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. (329 subscribers.) >Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC