Michael-Pappas [auda§michael-pappas.com] wrote:
> >> Vic wrote:
> > lets keep this in perspective, we are talking about products with tiny
> > margins. if you have to get a registrant to fax in magazine covers,
> > bills of sales, examples of product packaging, collate, store or
> > archive and cross check against everything else the registrant has
> > registered then the wholesale price is going to go up dramatically.
> >
> > use the dispute resolution system thats what it is there for.
> 
> Now aren't we talking about registrations that are basically in bulk. One
> company with a 60 domains is not a tiny margin for one sale... even if
> it's 10 domains it's not bad.
> 
> ONE Company can't have services in all these fields... plain and simple.
> 
> 
> How about using discretion where it's due! You seems to take the view that
> registrars do minimal work in relation to checks. The checks fall on the
> registrar and not the dispute resolution, other wise just let it be a free
> for all at the registrar level and disputes will resolve the rest.

we are not talking about a one off, why should one customer be singled out
over another? what you are asking is for a registrar to verify what the registrant
warrants is true. what you are talking about is a massive overhead in costs.
where do you draw the line? what about a registrant with 2 vastly different domains?

Vic