On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, ian.johnston§setel.com.au wrote: > > This issue is at the core of the fairness and openness of the > > registration system. All interested and eligible parties should > > have had an equal chance at getting the generic domain names. > > I also think that most people would agree with you, particularly the consumers > of - and competitors for - those generic domain name licences. The funny part is that some people just don't seem to realise that there's no intrinsic value in a 'generic'. Thus, there *is* intrinsic value in a generic (because there's a class of buyers who believe there is). Sorry, I mis-spoke that. The *funny* part is that some people believe there is intrinsic value in a 'generic'; and that they *also* believe they will be permitted to sell them (for the intrinsic + commission) "value". <goes back to sleep> SaliyaReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC