Re: [DNS] Geographic Domain Name Proposal

Re: [DNS] Geographic Domain Name Proposal

From: Richard Archer <rha§juggernaut.com.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:33:43 +1000
At 16:36 +1000 15/10/02, TV Fugly Awards wrote:

>I think that the Geographic Domain Name's are fine as long as it is heavily
>restricted. I also think the .law.au and .med.au extensions are fine too.
>Other than that I am really against an further extensions which will dilute
>and lessen the strength of the .au namespace.

Well since expressing one's opinion in the wrong place and at the wrong
time seems to be in vogue, I reckon the .law and .med domains are a
complete joke.

I mean, I own a farm and I want my blah.farm.au domain. If there was a
.law and a .med there would be no way on earth I would let up until I
had my .farm.au domain.

Same for my consulting business. You'd hear my hollers for a blah.con.au
domain all the way to the high court.

Oh, that's right. "con.au" is reserved for domain industry stakeholders.
Well, I want my "conned.au" domain then.

 ...R.
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC