Vic,
This sort of activity is totally in violation of the code of conduct and
AUDA should act. I have had the same problem occur so it's not an isolated
incident but common. The way we see it MIT are using their database as if
it's authoritive and clearly the authoritive database from July 1 is with
ausregistry. Come on Auda stop this breach of the code of conduct ...treat
all registrars with an even hand.
Rod Keys
Discount Domain Name Services
Resellers Stay Tuned www.ddns.com.au
----- Original Message -----
From: "Deus Ex Machina" <vicc&#167;cia.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [DNS] Melb IT Stuff up or Enetica?


> Brian Davis [brian&#167;domainz.com.au] wrote:
> > At 01:32 AM 5/11/2002, Kim Davies wrote:
> > >Quoting Brian Davis on Monday November 04, 2002:
> > >|
> > >| Which registrar has my clients name under my reseller agreement.
> > >| Who do I trust and believe?
> > >| I cannot find out from auda what is true.
> > >
> > >Why not? What does WHOIS say?
> > >
> > >kim
> >
> > Hmmm,
> > Whois &#167; ausregistry  says enetica is the registrar..
> >
> > So Melb IT just have stuffed up (again?)
>
> sending renewal notices to registrants where the registrar is not the
registrar of record is a
> breach of the code of conduct. perhaps bruce can shed more light...
>
> Vic
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (363 subscribers.)
>