At least they would be self funding and accountable to their local
communities


Phil Wright


-----Original Message-----
From: Lucian Daniel Kafka [mailto:luci§conexim.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:27 AM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] FW: Aust state domain name plan approved

At 12:09 AM 15/11/2002 +1100, you wrote:
>On face value it would appear that there is still a lot to work
out....?
>
>How about this suggestion:
>
>In this example - town or place name = geo and state abbreviation =
>state
>
>geo.state.au - controlled by local committee based upon chamber of
>commerce, council, shire, regional authority, etc   ie elected reps of
>stakeholders hold the license in trust for the community.
>
>Then in turn they provide an authority to local participants eg
>associations, organizations, committees and other bodies for access to
>the sub of the domain based upon uniform eligibility criteria ie a
>certification or permission to register and use the sub domain



More committees is good. I always felt that not enough of my tax dollars

are spent on committees.



Kind regards,

Lucian Kafka
www.conexim.com.au


------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the

author, further information at the above URL.  (363 subscribers.)