Without Prejudice, I think that's why we need a royal commission looking
over auDA, some thing is happening under the table, I reckon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Keys [mailto:rod§ddns.com.au] 
Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 2:46 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out

In MIT's defence they have agreed to mail all registrants (1500) with a
corrective letter. They have also run a corrective message on their web
sites front page. What's the point of independant investigation that's
why
we have auda to oversee the .au namespace.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Jumeau [mailto:Bluecom§comdom.net]
Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 4:39 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out


Without Prejudice. That's real funny the Melbourne IT mail out. If it
was any other registrar I'm sure there accreditation would have been
taken off them. Also why is there no consumer alert on Melbourne IT they
have done a mail out which is breaching the .au Domain Name Suppliers'
Code of Practice. Uregister.com.au did a mail out which breached the .au
Domain Name Suppliers' Code of Practice. It got listed on auDA consumer
alerts even though at the time were not bound by the .au Domain Name
Suppliers' Code of Practice. I think an independent investigation needs
to be conducted.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the

author, further information at the above URL.  (370 subscribers.)