To my knowledge, Enetica have *not* approached our clients directly.  Other
registrars *have* approached our clients.   We have always found Enetica
great to deal with.  What concerns me is that Enetica (and others) think it
ok to compete with their channel -  and target the same registrant client
who was introduced to them by the reseller.   that is a business practice
that is *not*  ok.


cheers
richard





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Domain Registration Services" <mail&#167;domainregistration.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: [DNS] Enetica


>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Have Enetica or any other Registrar approached your clients with regards
to
> taking them on as direct customers? Or has any Registrar approached your
> clients offering them additional services?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Keeves [mailto:richard&#167;ibc.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:48 PM
> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Enetica
>
>
>
> I am **NOT**  saying that resellers should be shielded from competition.
for
> you to say this seriously misses the point of the discussion.  But the
> competition should not come from the registrar whose services the reseller
> is reselling.  Enetica should not be competitng head-on with Enetica's own
> resellers - especially to a registrant who was introduced to the registrar
> by that very reseller.  if that is what is what auDA is encouraging thru
its
> policies then it not only sux, but it is evil. and in need of change.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>