IntaServe | Amin Kroll [amin.kroll§intaserve.com] wrote: > Hi all, > > This is our first post to the list but I've been reading the comments with a > lot of interest and felt it worthwhile to comment ... > > As a registrar (aswell as a previous reseller ourselves) we've built the > business over many years based on the premise of respect for our resellers > relationships with processes developed to prevent contact of your clients. > We never contact our domain resellers' clients directly unless express > permission has been granted to do so. Frankly it would be commercially > stupid to do so. > > We would like to take resellers up on the offer of a Guarantee of > 'non-contact' of your clients and formalise this with a document if need be. > The actual drawing up of such an agreement or Guarantee is not as 'easy' as > it sounds and may be frought with legal issues which is why IMO registrars > may have steered away from this. Realistically accidents may occurr as per > Melbourne ITs latest renewal reminder incident which I understand was a > technical accident. nice publicity stunt. so you are publically offering to breach the auda policies over transfer and direct registrant contracts? you are legally bound to enter into a contract directly with registrants. how do you propose to do this without the registrants knowledege? let us know if you work out how to by-pass the auda policies you are contractually bound to without auda suspending your registrar licence. VicReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC