All sounds good, BUT if Grace Bros was forced by industry policy to had over customer information to Nike, there would be protections in place to prevent Nike from using this information for anything other than record keeping. auDA have constructed a policy that revolves arround registrars. Resellers are expected to liease with the registrar about matters of concern then if the registrar thinks this is an issue for the industry the registrar goes to auDA and complains, then if auDA think its in the best interests of the registrars they will do somthing. The reseller has only one choice when it comes to their upstream registrar doing somthing dodgy, and thats change registrar. If auDA was to implament a policy protecting resellers, registrars would get upset in that the policy would be restricting they right to market their services, regardless of who they are marketing too, and as i said , auDA represents registrars. auDA monitor this list, many resellers have expressed concern and auDA have basicaly made 0 comment. their inaction represents the value auDA puts on resellers in this industry. JP.. Ron Stark [ronstark§snapsite.com.au] wrote: > In respect of the domain name, the only contract is between the > registrar and the registrant. Resellers don't exist. That's the auDA > model. > thats not entirely correct, there are contracts between the registrar and resellers and between registrants and resellers. what isnt allowed is an indirect contract with a registrant. For example Enetica's reseller contract binds the reseller to auda policies thus including them in the whole process. auda specifically require that anyone doing more then 10 domains a month is officially a reseller. Given that auda will not change anything in a rush, resellers should make the most of the situation, rather then trying to hide the registrar, where the registrar has a good reputation and a strong brand they should leverage off it. Just like you dont buy joe blogs rebranded shoes at the local shoe store you buy nikes, addidas etc. even though nike has company owned stores. unlike shoes a domain is not a physical product but a licence. imo the whole branding concept still applies. the actual licence is identical between registrars but the service and support and additional services are not and that is where the key diferentiators are for registrars and thus resellers. the same scenario happens everywhere I walk down my local plaza and half the small store brands are sold accross the path in grace bros. where I end up buying something depends on more factors then just price. if I am after advice I will go to the small store, if I know what I want and know there is a sale I will probably buy from GB. selling the knowledge that if there is an issue you may be sitting on a phone queue for 30 mintues with registrar XYZ or have to make international calls with registrar DEF but get rapid help with registrar ABC is just an obvious selling point that resellers can use to say this is why we use registrar ABC. as an example. if the concern for not letting customers see a registrars retail site is price then selecting registrars with high retail price is an obvious tactic provided they give you a good margin. Enetica specifically has a high retail price for this reason, to ensure reseller have a decent margin, higher in almost all cases then Enetica itself. imo the registrars that have a good reputation and service will dominate the ones which dont. Vic --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (368 subscribers.)Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC