Agreed however, a comparison of the problems at cause and effect (following attempted solution) are definitely worth undertaking at first instance.  Further, some problems are different in character to other problems so require different value judgments which can be categorised as either subjective and/or objective.  What I am raising as problems are in my submission objective problems.  Any assessment should be conducted to achieve an objective solution.  And public discussion of this problem is a good way of achieving an objective solution.

> Directed at the issue, not at an individual:
> 
> Surely, once successful, an organistion would like to keep a fixed set of
> outside contractors, with experience with their particular situation, rather
> than re-educating the cheapest on the list every time there was call to
> argue something in court, or get something drafted.
> 
> It makes no sense. If this has to happen, the amount of red tape will
> strangle AuDA, and we'll be left with no body to govern.
> 
> Directed at individuals
> If you identify a problem, propose a solution, and put forward both.
> If the solution causes greater problems than the problem it solves, then its
> not worthwhile.
> 
> -My 2 cents for Wednesday.
> 
> -Sean.