That is grand coming from a Board member.  And the point is that discussion on policy and any submissions can only be presented to members through the policy review postings.  

My submissions and anyone else's submissions should be published to open debate.  You seem not to get it.

Further as previously stated you have the option to delete when ever a posting comes up in my name.  So if members have no interest that is what they will do.

Thanks for disclosing your position on public discussion.  You won't be getting any vote from me.  That is a good reason I suppose to reject my application for membership at the next Board meeting.  Looking forward to doing some research on judicial revue.

> James Guy wrote:
> ] there is no way that any submissions to auda in correspondence or otherwise would see the light of day ouside of any board meeting.
> ] 
> 
> By "light of day" James obviously means something other than his submissions
> being read and considered.  Presumably he wants auDA to pay the costs to
> publish whatever he submits.
> 
> Now I think I understand why Mr Guy is filling up the DNS list.
> He wants to grandstand.  If his primary objective was to get answers
> or to suggest improvements to auDA, he would use a different approach.
> 
> Anyway, I've had enough of the volume on this list recently, I'm
> unsubscribing.  I might check back next month and see if traffic
> has dropped enough to get back on the DNS list. 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>  David Keegel <djk&#167;cybersource.com.au>  http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/
>  Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)