Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Deus Ex Machina <vicc§cia.com.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:53:14 +1100

Larry Bloch [larry.bloch&#167;netregistry.com.au] wrote:
> 
> As Kim rightly notes, every other policy has been rorted by registrants
> determined to obtain a name of choice.

and at the end of the day is the policy there to serve the customer or not?

Vic

Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Previous message: Larry Bloch: "RE: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
In reply to: Larry Bloch: "RE: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Next in thread: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Reply: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC