We can clear this up right now I believe. The domain in question is netrider.org.au, NetRegistry is the Registrar of the domain name. The legal entity owning the name is: Registrant: LS1 Owners Club of Australia Registrant ID: ABN 53415321024 On checking ABR the ABN matches the specified business name. My understanding is from the one piece of internal communication I've seen between Jason and a member of NetRegistry is that Jason is confusing the Registrant and the Registrant/Technical/Admin contacts. The way most Registrar systems operate is they authenticate particular contacts to manage the administration of the domain name. Sometimes these contacts are real people, sometimes they are roles within an organization. As it stands the Registrant contact we have on file (which is the same as the WHOIS information in this case) is not Jason Allen. We have procedures in place where for example if an authorized contact left an organization, an offier of the legal entity can follow a process that requests we modify the appropriate contacts. If Jason (Allen) is an officer of the LS1 Owners Club of Australia (the club President for example) he can request through appropriate channels the contacts be modified. If he is not then it becomes a matter for arbitration via the auDA specified Dispute Resolution Policy. So Jason over to you. If you meet the above criteria it should be a relatively trivial matter. If not then the process is less trivial. Regards, Brett Fenton NetRegistry Pty Ltd On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:21:05PM +1000, Jason Allen wrote: :> Jason Allen wrote: :> :> >So, on to my question ... what would the auDA policy be on who is the :> >'owner' of this .org.au domain (I believe it would be the 3 guys - or more :> >accurately the registered business name) and what steps/actions would be :> >involved in these 3 guys getting an auDA decision to transfer ownership of :> >the the domain record over to them (or more accurately, the business :> >name). :> :> Further to this, the registrar claims that it is not the organisation :> that is the legal leasee of the domain name, but the contact/s on the :> domain record that are the legal leasee. ie. The registrant organisation :> has no legal claim to the domain name, only the contact name/s listed on :> the domain record have any legal right to the domain name. :> :> How is this the case? Is every organisation/company that has a .au :> domain name in trouble if the contact person/s on their domain record :> get hit by a bus or leave the employment of that company? :> :> :> -- :> Cheers, :> Jason :> :> :> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- :> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ :> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the :> author, further information at the above URL. :> :> :> :> : -- Brett Fenton General Manager NetRegistry Pty Ltd _______________________________________________ http://www.netregistry.com.au/ Tel: +61 2 96996099 | Fax: +61 2 96996088 PO Box 270 Broadway | NSW 2007, Australia Your Total Internet Business Services Provider Trusted by 10,000s of Oz Businesses Since 1997 This email is from NetRegistry Pty Ltd. The contents of this message are commercial and in confidence to the intended addresseee. The message may contain copyrighted and/or legally priviledged information. No person or entity other than the intended recipient may read, print or store this message, including any and all attached files. The intended recipient may not forward this message to any third party without express written permission from NetRegistry Pty Ltd.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC