> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:04:21PM +0800, Kim Davies wrote:
> > That was the stated policy for some time, but I think the best summary
> > of the rules as they were applied in the 90's would be "inconsistent".
> 
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:25:41PM +1000, Chris Maltby wrote:
> They were certainly frustrating, but inconsistent I would strongly
> dispute (as I'm sure would kre).

There was a time in the 90s when there was a technical glitch which
meant that org.au applications which were pending (neither accepted
nor rejected) for a certain number of weeks were accepted automatically
-- without any decision from the org.au administrator.

___________________________________________________________________________
 David Keegel <djk&#167;cybersource.com.au>  http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/
 Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting