Ben McGinnes [ben§adversary.org] wrote: > Deus Ex Machina(vicc§cia.com.au)@Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:38:30AM +1000: > > > > privacy is not a perticularly fundamental right. In fact I cant think of > > any rights that are inferior to it, can you? > > In theory or practice? > > http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html > > Article 17 is the one you want, though most people here would probably > be proponents of Articles 18 and 19 too. the declaration uses the word "arbitrary" which in essence means that other rights are more important. for example contract rights and property rights. VicReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC