> > > At first glance, a pile of newly created off the shelf companies might > be a slight advantage: This makes a farce of the whole "random ballot" process and the one application per domain/entity rule. Yes, technically each company is a separate entity but it is blatantly obvious that these companies are all related and were created for the sole purpose of the ballot. Looks like whoever has the deepest pockets wins. Regardless, I'm no math genius but I would assume that to have a 1 in 4 chance of winning you would need to have an average of 25% of the applications for each domain. This makes the fact that all 5 domains were won by only two of the companies (AUSSIE DESTINATIONS (1) PTY LTD and AUSSIE DESTINATIONS (2) PTY LTD) even more interesting. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20050830/f65822bb/attachment.htmReceived on Tue Aug 30 2005 - 03:40:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC