So far he is the only one that's been found to do this, how many others did? Whoever drew up the rules either didn't foresee this happening or it is allowed. Still waiting on the auDA to say something. or are they still partying? bw _____ From: dns-bounces+bw=efe.com.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-bounces+bw=efe.com.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:19 AM To: '.au DNS Discussion List' Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man? I had many clients wanting these name and spending $2000 is pocket change compared to what the names are worth, Bottom line is the system FAILED and should be reviewed ASAP.. _____ From: dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:35 AM To: .au DNS Discussion List Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man? He's paid out $1000 to register the company and he's paid out about a $1000 for the release fee that's $2000. How many would have paid that figure to abide by the rules! Not many I would think. Do the maths on that one! I'm sorry but I don't understand your point. Are you saying that we shouldn't expect someone that spends that sort of money to abide by the rules? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20050831/a5ebe249/attachment.htmReceived on Wed Aug 31 2005 - 01:32:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC