Let's not forget, a domain name can be used for email only, and have a
redirection to its parent website, whether that redirection happens in a
split second, or 12 hours, all the while showing you an advert.

Are we to limit the amount of time it takes for a website to redirect? How
will this be monitored?

You're up SC without a paddle, no matter what half arsed policy is
introduced, or what rules auDA introduce, it will not be sufficient.

Like it was said before, no matter what rules are introduced, there will be
a way around it, it's pointless and a waste of money, and more importantly,
it will always, always have to be amended, oh yeah, that's the best way to
spend tax payer's money, or any revenue auDA generates.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-
> bounces+charlie=mccormack.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Lea de Groot
> Sent: Monday, 4 September 2006 8:42 PM
> To: .au DNS Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [DNS] dineonline.com.au
> 
> Charlie McCormack wrote:
> > There are real world laws that prevent this kind of restriction, it will
> > never happen, at least not in the next 10 years, governments have more
> > pressing issues, such as hospitals, transport, aging population etc.
> 
> Wow! Which laws cover this?
> I can't think of which it would be.
> 
> I wonder how far the premise of 'public space' can be pushed?
> Companies can rent real public spaces, but still be limited in what they
> are allowed to do there, IIRC. The internet can be thought of as public
> space, particularly given that the govt control the distribution of it,
> so it isn't too hard a step to have it treated in the same way.
> 
> Lea
> --
> Lea de Groot
> Elysian Systems
> Brisbane, Australia
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/