>I would assume that auDA would have a list of names
>registered under the monetisation policy and should
>audit them on occassion. In fact if you wish to
>register a domain for monetisation the registrant
>should be required to state that at time of
>registration.

How could they possibly know what a domain name is going to be used for
before it's actually been used?

There is no "monetisation policy" as such.  auDA have simply clarified "that
domain monetisation falls within the category ?a service that the registrant
provides?."

Jon


>-- Original Message --
>Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:18:28 +0100 (BST)
>From: David Jones <dj_david_jones&#167;yahoo.co.uk>
>To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
>Subject: Re: [DNS] Monetised
>Reply-To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
>
>
>
>--- Jon Lawrence <jon&#167;jonlawrence.com> wrote:
>
>> >If the domain was registered under the monetisation
>> >policy a blank page does not meet the eligibilty
>> >criteria. Therefore if a complaint is made
>> regarding
>> >the content of a monetised domain then the
>> registrant
>> >must comply with policy within 7 days or risk
>> losing
>> >the domain.
>> 
>> How do you know it's a "monetised" domain name if
>> there's no website?  Well
>> you can't, because it's not.
>
>I would assume that auDA would have a list of names
>registered under the monetisation policy and should
>audit them on occassion. In fact if you wish to
>register a domain for monetisation the registrant
>should be required to state that at time of
>registration.
>
>DJ
>
>
>
>		
>____________________________________________________ 
> 
>Yahoo! Photos is now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo.
>http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/