I have to say, I'm concerned that DCITA has blacked out text in those
submissions. I'm unsure as to the motivation behind it.

On 1/18/07, Ian Smith <smithi&#167;nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Josh Rowe wrote:
>  > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:12:34PM +0000, Kim Davies wrote:
>  > > Quoting Josh Rowe on Tuesday January 09, 2007:
>  > > |
>  > > | The submissions to the DCITA "Review of the structure and
>  > > | operation of the .au Internet domain" have been posted here:
>  > > | http://shorterlink.com/?7924AT
>  > >
>  > > I find it surprising that there weren't more public comments from
>  > > registrars. There is only a comment from Melbourne IT made public.
>  > >
>  > > kim
>  >
>  > There are now two extra submissions on the web site, the first from
>
> When did these turn up?  Thanks for the notice; I'd have missed them.
>
>  > NetRegistry and the second from the "Domain Industry Assocation"
>  > which says it represents the following registrars:
>  >
>  > Anchor Systems Pty Ltd
>  > AussieHQ Pty Ltd
>  > Australian Style Pty Ltd trading as Bottle Domains
>  > Discount Domain Name Services Pty Ltd
>  > Distribute.IT Pty Ltd trading as Click'n Go!
>  > Domain Central Pty Ltd
>  > Domain Directors Pty Ltd
>  > Enetica Pty Ltd
>  > Explorer Domains Pty Ltd
>  > IntaServe Pty Ltd
>  > Melbourne IT Ltd
>  > NetRegistry Pty Ltd
>  > Sublime IP Pty Ltd trading as GoDomains
>  > TPP Domains Pty Ltd trading as TPP Internet
>  > Wobygong Pty Ltd
>  >
>  > Both of these submissions have some text blacked out.
>
> Probably about you :)
>
> I find it interesting that Melbourne IT's submission is considerably at
> odds with these two closely idealogically aligned submissions in many
> respects, though I suppose they must have signed off on the latter?
>
> Cheers, Ian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>