Thank you for posting this Jeremy, John's submission was an interesting and well presented document. Jeremy Malcolm wrote: > On 07/05/2008, at 8:40 PM, info§enigmaticminds.com.au wrote: > >> With the apparent arbitrary and sometimes contradictory nature of >> some of auDA's decisions, and then the lack of recourse available to >> the registrant, it would be great to see a Domain Name Ombudsman in >> place to act as an independent umpire. >> >> Their are policies and procedures in place to deal with disputes >> between registrants as well as complaints against registrars but >> there is nothing in place to deal with issues relating to auDA >> themselves. >> >> An independent Domain Name Ombudsman could fill this void. > > You are not the first to propose this. John Selby of Macquarie > University who wrote his thesis on auDA came to a similar conclusion > in a submission to DCITA he write a couple of years ago: see > http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/55836/John_Selby_-_Macquarie_University.pdf. > I know this because I cite it in my own PhD thesis on Internet > governance (about to be published as a book; see > http://press.terminus.net.au/). >Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 23:45:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC