On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Jon Lawrence wrote: > If Westpac haven't noticed that registration in five months then > they're either incompetent or they're paying someone that's > incompetent. How, precisely, could they 'notice'? By trawling whois, like slammers? > I don't think that's a valid reason go keep/change/discuss the rules > relating to .com.au. So registrars no longer have ANY responsibility to verify registrants, under their licence to print money? > TM-law-wise, if neither Westpac nor St George protect their > Trademarks, they will eventually lose the protection (precisely why > Google will not let you make their brand into a verb). Heh .. google 'googling' .. you're unlikely to get 'caught' :) > Otherwise, that's the best argument I've heard, so far, for a .bank.au space. Yawn, IanReceived on Sat Oct 25 2008 - 22:48:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC