On 20/11/2009, at 10:39 AM, Brett Fenton wrote: > Perhaps you can tell me why any DNS provider would out of hand see > this as > something that is bad for an end user? > > a) They are only doing it on failed lookups (different story if they > were > pushing content on valid lookups, and I think they understand this > as well) > > b) If you want to see a 404, you can opt out of the system To clarify, its on NXDOMAIN only and not 404 - On the upside they appear to only be doing it for www records, if it were a blanket policy on all NXDOMAINs there would be issues with a whole range of things, think RBL's etc (As per your Verisign example). > > c) It's only internal to their own network, you aren't forced to use > it, if > you feel that its completely untenable, you can simply use an > alternate ISP. Its only on the personal plans, not business plans and worst case scenario you can simply use another set of DNS resolvers. > > It's a completely different story to say when Verisign did it and > there was no > alternative. They rightly copped a kick in the ass. > >> I noticed: >> >> http://www.crn.com.au/News/160923,bigpond-redirects-typos-to-unethical-bran >> ded-search-page.aspx >> >> And wonder if every other DNS service provider feels the same way as >> Brett Fenton of NetRegistry. >> >> Anand >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ Regards, Nick Brown Inticon Pty Ltd http://www.inticon.com.au Phone: 02 40010546 Direct: 02 40010511Received on Thu Nov 19 2009 - 16:01:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:10 UTC