Hi,

Like I think I was correctly quoted as saying. 

A small number of technical people are going to be upset about this. The rest 
of the world is going to be indifferent/ignorant. 

I think that's where we are at. I'm happy to be swayed, but I'm being 
agnostic, I need to see some real damage in the real world - Telsra beaking 
their own service doesn't count!

Past that it's an emotive issue (obviously) those passionately against it are 
vocal. As I've also said I'm indifferent, I don't think it's good or bad. So 
it's a bit pointless me debating with people who are pretty passionate about 
it.

> Hi Brett,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Brett Fenton
> 
> <brett.fenton&#167;netregistry.com.au> wrote:
> > Rather than give me a list of hypothetical potential issues, this type of
> > service has been launched in other markets, Telstra unsuprisingly aren't
> > the first. Are there any real world incidents that are documented that
> > show this as being a problem.
> 
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/317356/telstra_internet_outage_poin
> ts_dns_failure
> 
> How about when they deployed it?
> 
> If they screwed up deployment so badly, why would upgrades be any
>  different?
> 
> It is fairly late / early morning where I am (depending on your point
> of view), but I'll respond to the
> 
> > I googled for 30 minutes and couldn't come up with anything.
> 
> I googled for 3 minutes but I was not able to determine whom the
> technology provider in this case is -- if you were, then I am sure I
> can follow the deployed locations to find other instances of problems
> occurring in the real world.
> 
> Anand
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>