Skeeve Stevens wrote: > I have a few concerns about Melbourne IT and the way Billing currently occurs. > The current method goes as follows: > 1. User fills in domain name form at aunic.net > 2. Domain name sits onhold until a fax is received with credit card details. > This is unacceptable. If this is the only way they accept payment, then, It is not just unacceptable, it is contrary to the Trade Practices Act. (1974) and against federal law. You have been given the right by the Commonwealth to proceed to walk down to Melbourne I.T. and pay them cash. They are compelled to accept it. Apart from that, they don't have to offer any other scheme. If they don't, well, we all know what we think of them anyway. -- -Christopher Kuperman. .---------------------------------------------------------. Christopher Kuperman | Ph. (+61 3) 9482 4326 iNet Services Manager | Fx. (+61 3) 9489 5161 DyCom iNet Services division |------------------------- Email: chris§dycom.com.au | http://www.dycom.com.auReceived on Wed Nov 06 1996 - 02:52:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC