Glen Turner wrote:

> Simon Hackett wrote (in
> <3.0.1.32.19970803151909.01003490&#167;192.231.203.2>):
> > What I think Michael Malone has reminded us of in a recent mail
> message is
> > that not all DNA's are commercial ones - i.e. are operating in
> domains for
> > which $$$ are charged for services, and some of these domains may
> never
> > charge money for services.
>
> Some time back, Leni stated that only non-commerical domains
> were being considered in this process.
>
> Has there been (yet another) change of policy?
>

A while back I suggested that the selection process assume that
successful DNAs would want to operate within .com.au.  I suggested this
because it looked like there was a logjam developing in trying to make
the "staff" or "liquidity" requirement fit operators in low-volume
non-commercial domains vs. .com.au.

For example, I'm surprised that someone hasn't suggested that the
current $200,000 limit isn't a barrier to DNA operations in
non-commercial ADNA domains.

In any case, this list seems to be the main ADNA policy setting forum...

Leni.