-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

josh> My email was individually addressed to yourself, however the same
josh> general email content was sent to other Demand class members on a
josh> one-to-one basis.  While you might be classify it as spam, it is
josh> definitely not bulk (http://www.caube.org.au/whatis.htm).

The content forwarded to this list doesn't stray from the topic
of the upcoming election and Josh's wish to be elected.  Josh has
emailed voting members seeking their vote.

This seems a suitable use of email and I argue that being a
voting member means you explicitly and knowingly invite this
campaigning.

Do we really consider Josh's campaigning spam?  Simple replies to
me and I'll summarise back to the list.

Yours sincerely,

- -- Mark John Suter  | I know that you  believe  you understand
suter§humbug.org.au | what you think I said, but I am not sure
gpg key id 2C71D63D | you realise that what you  heard  is not
mobile 0411 262 316 | what I meant.        Robert J. McCloskey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Check Keyservers or http://zwitterion.org/keys/

iD8DBQE/sdPsRYso2ixx1j0RAk7wAJ9RMxBM14HprjWfVtOXM0xuf342AgCeMpHc
Cs77GWCmvTH/52ccEdeH5C8=
=d379
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----