Quoting Vic Cinc on Saturday November 25, 2006: | | another looming "solution" looking for a prolem, is internationalised domain names, | for which there is no demand. if auda wants idn then it should pay | for all 20 odd registrar systems to be modified to handle idn, because | for most registrars its going to be a non-recoverable investement. Why? If a registrar doesn't want to implement IDN support, they shouldn't have to. Let the registrars who want to sell them invest in whatever technology is required, and if Enetica doesn't want to sell IDNs, fine. Don't. kimReceived on Sat Nov 25 2006 - 17:20:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC